Slytherin Doctor

sjwstupidity:

crytical:

sjwstupidity:

curryonfire replied to your post: Before we get started I’d just like to…

what loser makes a blog called sjw stupidity and fakes being a disabled PoC my godddd

image

The most I intend to show of my face.

Shut the fuck up trying to silence people by denying their ethnicity.

i love you

the-unpopular-opinions:

Before we get started I’d just like to point out I’m a half white, half black overweight disabled man, I checked my privilege and according to the popular “privilege checklist” I’m pretty damn unprivileged, so any responses that I’m just a privileged cisman trying to tone police you poor oppressed groups…just fucking save it I’m not hearing it.

You know, I’m so fucking sick of this “reverse racism” and “reverse sexism” trend, where people suggest that methods of discrimination can only be aimed at minorities and if someone brings up instances of said discrimination being aimed at white/hetero/cis/males they tag on “reverse” at the beginning to de-legitimize it.

It’s fucking annoying, okay? Because yes I get that you’re saying this method of discrimination is central to your “oppression,” so you say. That you experience this more than you believe anyone else does, and that no one of any differing persuasion can know your struggles. So you think the answer is to argue with every single person who uses the word for the type of discrimination you face the most in reference to someone not of your group? To tell them over and over that they cannot face your type of discrimination, because to you, their use of the word is more important than the shit they’re dealing with because only your own personal pet oppression is the most important, well fuck you.

First of all, sexism, racism, and phobias come in all different forms. Qualifying everything by oppression is fucking ridiculous and it’s something a 5 year old would think up.

“Oh hey, neighbor, as you can see my house got egged last night, you didn’t happen to see who—”“Excuse you, check your privilege, your house cannot get egged.”
“W-What..?”
“As a homosexual married couple our house gets egged on a regular basis. House eggings are a direct result of homophobic oppression we in the LGBT community face and your cishet white privileged family could not possibly know anything about the struggles we oppressed minorities face.”
“Oh…well, they uh…threw eggs at my house?”
“Oh yeah, I think I know the kids who did it, I’ll get their mother’s number for you so you can give them a piece of your mind.”

I mean this is literally the next step of what this whole ridiculous social justice movement is doing. You would literally see to it that any negative thing that one person can do to another will have to be qualified with “oppression” in order for it to exist…and if it doesn’t have an oppression component (if it happens to white cishet males) then you have to use a different set of words.
Did someone discriminate against you based on your race? Racism! Oh you’re white? Racial prejudice or discrimination!

Did someone discriminate against you based on your sex? SEXISM! Oh wait you’re a male? Patriarchy backfirin’!

Did someone discriminate against you out of fear and hatred based on your gender identity? Transphobia! Oh wait you’re cis? Righteous and harmless outlashing from oppressed transpeople who have every right to hate you for what people who identify similarly to you did! How dare you even complain?!

If you fancy yourself a social justice warrior then tryyy actually putting the energy you put into insulting privileged groups into actually educating those who would like to understand where you’re coming from and allying to your cause. Get over yourselves, just because someone isn’t aware of your struggles or has privilege doesn’t mean they’re oppressing you. Get over this theory that people who don’t face your oppression are benefitting from your oppression (cis people don’t benefit from the oppression of trans, that’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard….if transpeople didn’t exist, the treatment cis people face from other cis people would not be altered, you’re literally making shit up) and therefore deserve your scorn.

And last but not least, “stupid,” “moron,” and “idiot” aren’t “ableist slurs.” Mental retardation and mental illness isn’t “stupidity.” Learning disabilities aren’t “stupidity.” “Stupidity” means low intelligence and understanding. They can be components of disabilities, but are not in and of themselves disabilities. Asserting that anyone with mental illness or retardation is “stupid” is itself ableist. When you suggest that someone calling you “stupid” is being ableist, you’re actually deflecting criticism of your dumb ass comments so that you don’t have to address how dumb the shit you just said actually was. We all know it, and you’re not fooling anyone but yourself. So please stop.

Stop being dumbasses, tumblr social justice warriors. You’re literally the most unpleasant fucking people to be around…you make my super-religious Baptist aunt (who once told me ghost stories were the work of the devil, I wasn’t supposed to enjoy scary movies and could literally find something “ungodly” about every piece of media I ever attempted to enjoy in her presence growing up) seem like the life of the fucking party. Like seriously, how boring must you be to those around you?

And before you complain that I’m being really insulting in this post…isn’t that what you call tone-policing?! So fuck off!

the-unpopular-opinions:

Before we get started I’d just like to point out I’m a half white, half black overweight disabled man, I checked my privilege and according to the popular “privilege checklist” I’m pretty damn unprivileged, so any responses that I’m just a privileged cisman trying to tone police you poor oppressed groups…just fucking save it I’m not hearing it.

You know, I’m so fucking sick of this “reverse racism” and “reverse sexism” trend, where people suggest that methods of discrimination can only be aimed at minorities and if someone brings up instances of said discrimination being aimed at white/hetero/cis/males they tag on “reverse” at the beginning to de-legitimize it.

It’s fucking annoying, okay? Because yes I get that you’re saying this method of discrimination is central to your “oppression,” so you say. That you experience this more than you believe anyone else does, and that no one of any differing persuasion can know your struggles. So you think the answer is to argue with every single person who uses the word for the type of discrimination you face the most in reference to someone not of your group? To tell them over and over that they cannot face your type of discrimination, because to you, their use of the word is more important than the shit they’re dealing with because only your own personal pet oppression is the most important, well fuck you.

First of all, sexism, racism, and phobias come in all different forms. Qualifying everything by oppression is fucking ridiculous and it’s something a 5 year old would think up.

Oh hey, neighbor, as you can see my house got egged last night, you didn’t happen to see who—”
“Excuse you, check your privilege, your house cannot get egged.”

W-What..?”

As a homosexual married couple our house gets egged on a regular basis. House eggings are a direct result of homophobic oppression we in the LGBT community face and your cishet white privileged family could not possibly know anything about the struggles we oppressed minorities face.”

Oh…well, they uh…threw eggs at my house?”

Oh yeah, I think I know the kids who did it, I’ll get their mother’s number for you so you can give them a piece of your mind.”

I mean this is literally the next step of what this whole ridiculous social justice movement is doing. You would literally see to it that any negative thing that one person can do to another will have to be qualified with “oppression” in order for it to exist…and if it doesn’t have an oppression component (if it happens to white cishet males) then you have to use a different set of words.


Did someone discriminate against you based on your race? Racism! Oh you’re white? Racial prejudice or discrimination!

Did someone discriminate against you based on your sex? SEXISM! Oh wait you’re a male? Patriarchy backfirin’!

Did someone discriminate against you out of fear and hatred based on your gender identity? Transphobia! Oh wait you’re cis? Righteous and harmless outlashing from oppressed transpeople who have every right to hate you for what people who identify similarly to you did! How dare you even complain?!

If you fancy yourself a social justice warrior then tryyy actually putting the energy you put into insulting privileged groups into actually educating those who would like to understand where you’re coming from and allying to your cause. Get over yourselves, just because someone isn’t aware of your struggles or has privilege doesn’t mean they’re oppressing you. Get over this theory that people who don’t face your oppression are benefitting from your oppression (cis people don’t benefit from the oppression of trans, that’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard….if transpeople didn’t exist, the treatment cis people face from other cis people would not be altered, you’re literally making shit up) and therefore deserve your scorn.

And last but not least, “stupid,” “moron,” and “idiot” aren’t “ableist slurs.” Mental retardation and mental illness isn’t “stupidity.” Learning disabilities aren’t “stupidity.” “Stupidity” means low intelligence and understanding. They can be components of disabilities, but are not in and of themselves disabilities. Asserting that anyone with mental illness or retardation is “stupid” is itself ableist. When you suggest that someone calling you “stupid” is being ableist, you’re actually deflecting criticism of your dumb ass comments so that you don’t have to address how dumb the shit you just said actually was. We all know it, and you’re not fooling anyone but yourself. So please stop.

Stop being dumbasses, tumblr social justice warriors. You’re literally the most unpleasant fucking people to be around…you make my super-religious Baptist aunt (who once told me ghost stories were the work of the devil, I wasn’t supposed to enjoy scary movies and could literally find something “ungodly” about every piece of media I ever attempted to enjoy in her presence growing up) seem like the life of the fucking party. Like seriously, how boring must you be to those around you?

And before you complain that I’m being really insulting in this post…isn’t that what you call tone-policing?! So fuck off!

mildlyamused:

sorryforhavinganopinion:

One time I was playing The Sims. My kid had a soccer game, and while the teams were huddled up, I changed to buy mode and put washing machines around the opposing team, enclosing them within their detergent scented prison. Thanks to my ingenious strategy, my child’s team was able to take the ball from the opposite goalie and score repeatedly. By the time the clock ran out, we were up 46-0, and the opposing team was sobbing in puddles of their own piss. I am the best soccer mom.

PARENTING

bioshockalacka:

Is the “Welcome to Tumblr” video the next big thing that tumblr takes too seriously and feels the need to turn into a social issue??

Complete with slam poetry, 5-page rants, and shitty powerpoints outlining why it’s awful and you shouldn’t be allowed to enjoy it??

Jelloapocalypse: "Look at this video making fun of Facebook"
Tumblr: "lololol sooo funny and true!"
Jelloapocalypse: "look! Deviantart!"
Tumblr: "ha so true!"
Jelloapocalypse: "Look at this video making fun of Tumblr and how users get overly sensitive!"
Tumblr: "HOW COULD YOU YOU'RE LITERALLY A FUCKING NAZI UNSUBBED CALLED THE FUCKING POLICE AND SENDING MY ARMY OF MIDDLE SCHOOLERS AFTER YOU I CANT WHAT IS AIR BECAUSE YOU MAY AS WELL BE TAKING AWAY MY OXYGEN TOO YOU OPPRESSIVE X-PHOBIC SHITLORD"

oursillylittlethings:

2ndratehandjob:

lady-dirtbag:

marchqueen:

tastefullyoffensive:

Portals to Hell by hrmphfft

IT’S BACK

I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO FIND THIS AGAIN FOR MONTHS

I AM SO HAPPY RIGHT NOW

ITS BACK 

ARE WE NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GUY WITH THE TRAP DOOR, THE DUDE THAT RAN AFTER HIM JUST CLOSES IT AND CONTINUES WITH HIS DAY.

lostquaintrelle:

social-darwin-awards:

jas720:

social-darwin-awards:

jas720:

social-darwin-awards:

jas720:

social-darwin-awards:

Reminder: This is the exact same kind of fear and prejudice expressed when you say you are afraid to walk down the street because every man is a potential rapist. Your sexism is not any different from the racism in this picture. The only difference is that it is ingrained in our society to be appalled by the sentiment in this picture, and not by the same towards the male sex.

Okay everything you just said is wrong.1. Between 1 in 4 - 1 in 6 women will be raped2. You are invalidating the very real trauma that rape survivors have by comparing their unease to racism3. That picture is literally the basis of law enforcement policy.
So if you can’t stop with the antifeminist bull shit could you at least not be racist while doing it.

1. This statistic is demonstrably false and I suggest you stop mindlessly spouting it because you read it on a blog. Even if it were true, 1 in 4 to 1 in 6 is a totally unacceptable standard deviation. Do you understand that is the difference between 25% and roughly 17%? That’s somewhere around 12,472,000 women who exist in rape limbo. Will they be raped? We just don’t know.
2. Wrong. I am comparing the thought process that leads to racism to the thought process that leads people to say that all men are rapists, AKA, sexism. If you assume a man on the street is a potential rapist and avoid him because he is a man, you are sexist.
3. The definition of rape excludes the majority of male rape victims. Feminists in the Nordic lands have recommended banning the criticism of feminism [English], men have almost gone to prison for false rape allegations (saved only by having bought a bagel) because everyone assumed they were guilty from the start (as opposed to, you know, innocent until proven guilty), a man was convicted for withdrawing from sex seconds too late, a man in France was ordered to pay damages to his wife for lack of sex. Ridicule from feminists drove the owner of a shelter for abused men and children to suicide. Men in general are more likely to commit suicide than women by a lot. 6 in 7 homeless people are male. Fathers win just 10% of custody battles — thanks to feminism.
Sorry, everything you just said is wrong. Gosh, that’s kind of ironic, isn’t it?

Lord spare me “men’s rights activists”

Wrong right out the gate. I’m not an MRA. I’m an egalitarian.

1. Your debunking is literally “I don’t believe therefore its not true”

Actually, that’s literally your debunking. You have not cited a single source this entire conversation. I’ve cited… eleven. All of them have given reasons and evidence for why your claims are false.

2. No you are invalidating the emotions of victims with your “logic”

I hate to break it to you, but this is not a bad thing. Being emotional is no substitute for being right. The picture above was made as a product of emotion, rather than logic.

3. The only way your comparison works is if you ignore all history, statistics, and power dynamics and radically rewrite the definition of bigotry.

You are the one ignoring history and statistics. Your “power dynamics” are pure conjecture. I’m sure you’d like to rewrite the definition of bigotry; then you could make yourself not a bigot.
The behavior you’re exhibiting is known as “projection,” by the way.


Wrong right out the gate. I’m not an MRA. I’m an egalitarian.

I really don’t care what brand of misogyny you prefer

Declaring not one, but two, entire movements for equality as “misogynistic.” Hilarious.


Actually, that’s literally your debunking. You have not cited a single source this entire conversation. I’ve cited… eleven. All of them have given reasons and evidence for why your claims are false.

You have access to google same as I do if you were really interested you would look it up for yourself.

But… I did. And I found that you were wrong. And I presented the evidence to you. That’s what you do. That’s why I won the argument.

11 “sources” aren’t as convincing as you imagine them to be

You have yet to give literally any reason why this would be so.


I hate to break it to you, but this is not a bad thing. Being emotional is no substitute for being right. The picture above was made as a product of emotion, rather than logic.

Nor is willful ignorance but that doesn’t stop you,

Not even pot meets kettle. More like… pot meets spoon.

if you think that what that picture represents is anything close to the sentiment that historically men are the worst thing to happen to women then you are a racist in addition to a misogynist.

I absolutely believe that the sentiment that men are the worst thing to happen to women is equivalent to the sentiment expressed by the picture. You are sexist, and it’s as vile and disgusting as the image.

Youare the one ignoring history and statistics. Your “power dynamics” are pure conjecture. I’m sure you’d like to rewrite the definition of bigotry; then you could make yourself not a bigot.
Okay I’m dealing with someone who thinks reality is up for debate.

Perhaps you have heard of “science?”
Guess what, buddy boy: When you claim that something is reality (i.e. fact), you must PROVE IT (i.e. evidence). Otherwise, your word is literally worthless. You are attempting to besiege my castle with a fork.

Most positions of power are occupied by men and have for centuries, to say men are a oppressed class is just to ignore reality.

Neither men nor women are oppressed in the modern United States, and probably the entire first world, though I do not possess as much expertise on other countries. However, men are subject to equivalent measures of unfair treatment under the law as women. I have provided multiple examples that you promptly ignored.

Since you only care about men I will let you in on something every feminist knows,

I’ve never seen a feminist admit to being part of a hive mind. How could you possibly know that?

not only are men historically disastrous for women they are also the worst thing that has happened to men. Statistically men face more violence yes but that violence is usually at the hands of other men. 

How is this even rational? Men are the worst thing that has happened to men? Sorry, oppressed myself a little there. What?
It’s almost as though being a bad person was not attributable to gender. It’s almost as though classism drove suffering historically, not the patriarchy. (Fun fact: The idea of men being rapists was started by rich white women and aimed at black men.) It’s almost as though this line of thinking is incredibly sexist.
You’re a bigot and it’s very sad.

A note on that “assuming men are dangerous is sexist” bullshit. Most of the people who murder or rape women are men. By more than a little bit.
Look at how cops and courts treat rape victims now. “What were you wearing?” “Were you drinking?” “How many people have you had sex with?” As if these questions are relevant at all to the question of “were you forced to have sex against your will?” It’s almost like people think anything the victim does causes rape! Spoiler: it doesn’t. That case where a guy was almost convicted on a false accusation is an extreme statistical outlier, because the vast majority of rapists get away with it (only about half of rapes are ever even reported). 
So, it’s sexist to be wary of men. And yet, if a man does hurt us, we’ll be asked why we weren’t more wary. And it’s not like we’re psychic — we cannot tell by looking at them who’s dangerous and who isn’t.
I don’t know about you, but between those options, I’m picking the one that doesn’t land me in the fucking hospital. (I’m aware that rape is far from a guarantee, but a) I belong to a couple of groups that are, statistically, more likely to be raped b) if “oh it won’t happen to me/the chances aren’t that big” were your excuses for driving recklessly, people would think you were insane.)
By the way, one in three men would commit rape if they knew they could get away with it. So it’s not like the population of dangerous men is tiny.
A few other notes:
Women are more likely to attempt suicide, men are more likely to succeed because they’re more likely to use a violent method (gun, hanging). Theory is that this is because men are socialized not to shy away from violence. So, patriarchy.
Men win 70% of custody battles. 10% of men have custody because the vast majority of custody is decided out of court, and women are just assumed to be better caregivers. Again, patriarchy. Also, mentioning abuse from the husband makes the wife less likely to win custody in court.

"So, it’s sexist to be wary of men. And yet, if a man does hurt us, we’ll be asked why we weren’t more wary. And it’s not like we’re psychic — we cannot tell by looking at them who’s dangerous and who isn’t."

So it’s racist to be wary of blacks. And yet, if a blackie does hurt us, we’ll be asked why we weren’t more wary. And it’s not like we’re psychic —we cannot tell by looking at them who’s dangerous and who isn’t.

lostquaintrelle:

social-darwin-awards:

jas720:

social-darwin-awards:

jas720:

social-darwin-awards:

jas720:

social-darwin-awards:

Reminder: This is the exact same kind of fear and prejudice expressed when you say you are afraid to walk down the street because every man is a potential rapist. Your sexism is not any different from the racism in this picture. The only difference is that it is ingrained in our society to be appalled by the sentiment in this picture, and not by the same towards the male sex.

Okay everything you just said is wrong.
1. Between 1 in 4 - 1 in 6 women will be raped
2. You are invalidating the very real trauma that rape survivors have by comparing their unease to racism
3. That picture is literally the basis of law enforcement policy.

So if you can’t stop with the antifeminist bull shit could you at least not be racist while doing it.

1. This statistic is demonstrably false and I suggest you stop mindlessly spouting it because you read it on a blog. Even if it were true, 1 in 4 to 1 in 6 is a totally unacceptable standard deviation. Do you understand that is the difference between 25% and roughly 17%? That’s somewhere around 12,472,000 women who exist in rape limbo. Will they be raped? We just don’t know.

2. Wrong. I am comparing the thought process that leads to racism to the thought process that leads people to say that all men are rapists, AKA, sexism. If you assume a man on the street is a potential rapist and avoid him because he is a man, you are sexist.

3. The definition of rape excludes the majority of male rape victims. Feminists in the Nordic lands have recommended banning the criticism of feminism [English], men have almost gone to prison for false rape allegations (saved only by having bought a bagel) because everyone assumed they were guilty from the start (as opposed to, you know, innocent until proven guilty), a man was convicted for withdrawing from sex seconds too late, a man in France was ordered to pay damages to his wife for lack of sex. Ridicule from feminists drove the owner of a shelter for abused men and children to suicide. Men in general are more likely to commit suicide than women by a lot. 6 in 7 homeless people are male. Fathers win just 10% of custody battlesthanks to feminism.

Sorry, everything you just said is wrong. Gosh, that’s kind of ironic, isn’t it?

Lord spare me “men’s rights activists”

Wrong right out the gate. I’m not an MRA. I’m an egalitarian.

1. Your debunking is literally “I don’t believe therefore its not true”

Actually, that’s literally your debunking. You have not cited a single source this entire conversation. I’ve cited… eleven. All of them have given reasons and evidence for why your claims are false.

2. No you are invalidating the emotions of victims with your “logic”

I hate to break it to you, but this is not a bad thing. Being emotional is no substitute for being right. The picture above was made as a product of emotion, rather than logic.

3. The only way your comparison works is if you ignore all history, statistics, and power dynamics and radically rewrite the definition of bigotry.

You are the one ignoring history and statistics. Your “power dynamics” are pure conjecture. I’m sure you’d like to rewrite the definition of bigotry; then you could make yourself not a bigot.

The behavior you’re exhibiting is known as “projection,” by the way.

Wrong right out the gate. I’m not an MRA. I’m an egalitarian.

I really don’t care what brand of misogyny you prefer

Declaring not one, but two, entire movements for equality as “misogynistic.” Hilarious.

Actually, that’s literally your debunking. You have not cited a single source this entire conversation. I’ve cited… eleven. All of them have given reasons and evidence for why your claims are false.

You have access to google same as I do if you were really interested you would look it up for yourself.

But… I did. And I found that you were wrong. And I presented the evidence to you. That’s what you do. That’s why I won the argument.

11 “sources” aren’t as convincing as you imagine them to be

You have yet to give literally any reason why this would be so.

I hate to break it to you, but this is not a bad thing. Being emotional is no substitute for being right. The picture above was made as a product of emotion, rather than logic.

Nor is willful ignorance but that doesn’t stop you,

Not even pot meets kettle. More like… pot meets spoon.

if you think that what that picture represents is anything close to the sentiment that historically men are the worst thing to happen to women then you are a racist in addition to a misogynist.

I absolutely believe that the sentiment that men are the worst thing to happen to women is equivalent to the sentiment expressed by the picture. You are sexist, and it’s as vile and disgusting as the image.

Youare the one ignoring history and statistics. Your “power dynamics” are pure conjecture. I’m sure you’d like to rewrite the definition of bigotry; then you could make yourself not a bigot.

Okay I’m dealing with someone who thinks reality is up for debate.

Perhaps you have heard of “science?”

Guess what, buddy boy: When you claim that something is reality (i.e. fact), you must PROVE IT (i.e. evidence). Otherwise, your word is literally worthless. You are attempting to besiege my castle with a fork.

Most positions of power are occupied by men and have for centuries, to say men are a oppressed class is just to ignore reality.

Neither men nor women are oppressed in the modern United States, and probably the entire first world, though I do not possess as much expertise on other countries. However, men are subject to equivalent measures of unfair treatment under the law as women. I have provided multiple examples that you promptly ignored.

Since you only care about men I will let you in on something every feminist knows,

I’ve never seen a feminist admit to being part of a hive mind. How could you possibly know that?

not only are men historically disastrous for women they are also the worst thing that has happened to men. Statistically men face more violence yes but that violence is usually at the hands of other men. 

How is this even rational? Men are the worst thing that has happened to men? Sorry, oppressed myself a little there. What?

It’s almost as though being a bad person was not attributable to gender. It’s almost as though classism drove suffering historically, not the patriarchy. (Fun fact: The idea of men being rapists was started by rich white women and aimed at black men.) It’s almost as though this line of thinking is incredibly sexist.

You’re a bigot and it’s very sad.

A note on that “assuming men are dangerous is sexist” bullshit. Most of the people who murder or rape women are men. By more than a little bit.

Look at how cops and courts treat rape victims now. “What were you wearing?” “Were you drinking?” “How many people have you had sex with?” As if these questions are relevant at all to the question of “were you forced to have sex against your will?” It’s almost like people think anything the victim does causes rape! Spoiler: it doesn’t. That case where a guy was almost convicted on a false accusation is an extreme statistical outlier, because the vast majority of rapists get away with it (only about half of rapes are ever even reported). 

So, it’s sexist to be wary of men. And yet, if a man does hurt us, we’ll be asked why we weren’t more wary. And it’s not like we’re psychic — we cannot tell by looking at them who’s dangerous and who isn’t.

I don’t know about you, but between those options, I’m picking the one that doesn’t land me in the fucking hospital. (I’m aware that rape is far from a guarantee, but a) I belong to a couple of groups that are, statistically, more likely to be raped b) if “oh it won’t happen to me/the chances aren’t that big” were your excuses for driving recklessly, people would think you were insane.)

By the way, one in three men would commit rape if they knew they could get away with it. So it’s not like the population of dangerous men is tiny.

A few other notes:

Women are more likely to attempt suicide, men are more likely to succeed because they’re more likely to use a violent method (gun, hanging). Theory is that this is because men are socialized not to shy away from violence. So, patriarchy.

Men win 70% of custody battles. 10% of men have custody because the vast majority of custody is decided out of court, and women are just assumed to be better caregivers. Again, patriarchy. Also, mentioning abuse from the husband makes the wife less likely to win custody in court.

"So, it’s sexist to be wary of men. And yet, if a man does hurt us, we’ll be asked why we weren’t more wary. And it’s not like we’re psychic — we cannot tell by looking at them who’s dangerous and who isn’t."

So it’s racist to be wary of blacks. And yet, if a blackie does hurt us, we’ll be asked why we weren’t more wary. And it’s not like we’re psychic —we cannot tell by looking at them who’s dangerous and who isn’t.

the-festive-edson:

missmantodea:

the-last-decent-url:

missmantodea:

♥ DEAD MEN DON’T CATCALL ♥

Nor do genuinely decent men, or classy men, or men with wives/girlfriends, or in fact MOST living breathing men. The few that do? Find where their mother, sister, girlfriend and/or wives live and rebuke them over teaching their barbarian some manners. End of story

♥ DEAD MEN DON’T ADD BORING, UNNECESSARY “BUT WAH WAH WAH NOT ALL MEN” COMMENTARY TO PEOPLE’S ARTWORK ♥

I think this is a decent time to mention that one doesn’t have to generalize and bash the male gender to promote feminism or women’s rights.
As a male-by-choice, I think you’re being entirely unfair by calling this person out and degrading what is a perfectly legitimate comment. Most guys (myself included) would never catcall a woman and would in fact throw punches should he ever witness such unacceptable behavior.
And as a woman-by-birth, I think your idea of equality is skewed and you need to find a better way to express your support of women’s rights. You’re making all the decent feminists look bad. This is the sort if reason why non-feminists think all feminists are assholes.

Wait, there are feminists out there who are not assholes? Somehow I don’t believe this. Considering basically all the reactions to this post. And the post itself. And tumblr in general. There’s so much hate on this website, as a liberal I’m frankly appalled. A website that is supposedly so open and non-jugemental is actually filled with hatred and generalizations of people based on things people can’t help. It’s like I’m living in the deep south of the US again.

the-festive-edson:

missmantodea:

the-last-decent-url:

missmantodea:

♥ DEAD MEN DON’T CATCALL 

Nor do genuinely decent men, or classy men, or men with wives/girlfriends, or in fact MOST living breathing men. The few that do? Find where their mother, sister, girlfriend and/or wives live and rebuke them over teaching their barbarian some manners. End of story

♥ DEAD MEN DON’T ADD BORING, UNNECESSARY “BUT WAH WAH WAH NOT ALL MEN” COMMENTARY TO PEOPLE’S ARTWORK 

I think this is a decent time to mention that one doesn’t have to generalize and bash the male gender to promote feminism or women’s rights.

As a male-by-choice, I think you’re being entirely unfair by calling this person out and degrading what is a perfectly legitimate comment. Most guys (myself included) would never catcall a woman and would in fact throw punches should he ever witness such unacceptable behavior.

And as a woman-by-birth, I think your idea of equality is skewed and you need to find a better way to express your support of women’s rights. You’re making all the decent feminists look bad. This is the sort if reason why non-feminists think all feminists are assholes.

Wait, there are feminists out there who are not assholes? Somehow I don’t believe this. Considering basically all the reactions to this post. And the post itself. And tumblr in general. There’s so much hate on this website, as a liberal I’m frankly appalled. A website that is supposedly so open and non-jugemental is actually filled with hatred and generalizations of people based on things people can’t help. It’s like I’m living in the deep south of the US again.